this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

15591 readers
35 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)

This is a self-referential paradox — a classic logic puzzle designed to be tricky. Let’s break it down:

Step-by-step analysis:

  1. How many choices? There are 4 possible answers, so if we pick one randomly, the chance of picking any specific one is 1 in 4 = 25%.

  2. How many answers say “25%”? Two.

  3. That means the probability of randomly choosing an answer that says “25%” is 2 in 4 = 50%.

  4. But if the correct answer is 50%, then only one option says “50%” — which is (c). So the probability of picking it at random is 1 in 4 = 25%, contradicting the idea that 50% is correct.

  5. If the correct answer is 25%, then two options say that — a and d. So the chance of picking one of those at random is 50%, not 25% — again a contradiction.

  6. Similarly, if 60% is correct (only one option), then the chance of picking it randomly is 25%, which again makes it incorrect.

Conclusion: Any choice leads to a contradiction. This is a self-referential paradox, meaning the question breaks logical consistency. There is no consistent correct answer.

[–] Applejuicy@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] judgyweevil@feddit.it 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Can't tell if serious because entering ( c ) without the spaces is (c) in Firefox and other browsers.

Is it because the other letters don't have brackets? I don't use AI to know if that is a thing.

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 months ago
[–] br3d@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's whatever browser or app you're using. It rendered as (c) for me... Bracket, c, bracket

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, parenthesis, and parenthesis, but yes

[–] cazssiew@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Parentheses can also be called (round) brackets, especially in the UK

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

ah, TIL, thanks

[–] neo2478@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The em dash is a dead giveaway as well

[–] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I try to use em dashes when I can, but I think they're used wrong in the comment above (IIRC they're not supposed to be surrounded by spaces, but I could be wrong). What tips me off is the unambiguously "LLM" narrative voice and structure ("let's break it down", followed by an ordered list). Not that a human can't type that, but sometimes it seems like ChatGPT is incapable of spitting out words in any other structure.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago

You’re right, en dashes would have been fine there. Em dashes don’t get spaced—and have specific grammatical uses too.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

Y'all have got to stop this shit. Real people use real grammar.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I use em dashes all the time, but I don’t put a space on either side—I feel like that’s not the correct way to use one. If it is, I don’t wanna be correct.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago

Heyo yee em—comrade

[–] Reyali@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I used to use em dashes all the time and now I find myself rethinking my writing styles because of people like you and it’s obnoxious.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

AI has put me off writing lists.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

Got it right though

[–] KammicRelief@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

haha yeah, I knew it at the "let's break it down:"
I was like.. I know this voice....

[–] josefo@leminal.space 0 points 2 months ago

"Conclusion:" was the final nail in the coffin

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The motivation to do so confuses me. There's no karma to farm here.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why not? Here upvotes do the same as karma in reddit. Absolutely nothing.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 months ago

Eh. On Reddit, karma was intended as an indicator of quality and authenticity. It was heavily flawed and abused by bots and propagandists.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 0 points 2 months ago

It's still providing a correct explanation to people, I guess

[–] ornery_chemist@mander.xyz 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

^dontthinkaboutitdontthinkaboutitdontthinkaboutit^

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 0 points 2 months ago

I would think that if you truly pick at random, it's still a 25% chance no matter how you cut it

[–] Deepus@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

...so like, which one you picking?

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The comment - which isn't edited - uses (c).

Whatever client you use replaces/renders (c) [bracket c bracket] as ©.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 months ago

Huh. I think it was just the web version of Lemmy. Weird choice by the Lemmy devs.