this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
426 points (73.5% liked)
Selfhosted
46671 readers
815 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Because there's no serious answers being given even though there are at least 2:
Algae is also more efficient per cubic meter, if I understand correctly.
Not just more efficient, vastly more efficient. Algae is 10-50 times faster at processing CO² than trees are. Some algae can be up to 400x as efficient.
It's just not as "nice" to look at, we usually associate algae with growth in unsafe bodies of water like bogs, etc. versus a nice clean pool or even a maintained pond.
On the other hand, algae do not produce shade, not sure if it filters atmospheric pollutants, and trees provide all sort of other services to the local ecosystem.
Maybe this invention can be used on places where trees cannot lives, but I'd still take a city with trees over a city full of green tanks.
These in the spots where trees once stood but were too destructive & trees everywhere else imo. Cool tech future AND trees, plus these are benches too it looks like
This part is the most surprising. For something meant to go in urban areas, where's the hostile architecture? No railings between seats? No spikes?
That sounds like it needs its own community. "Hostile Architecture" I love it.
Edit: I googled the term and think it could be a sub. https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/designing-for-typologies/hostile-architecture-anti-homeless-architecture/
In the magpie nests
(Sorry, you made me think of this article)
Don't forget pollen and seeds.
Bees need pollen. We need bees and you can self host them.
Oh yeah
I'm one of those elites who don't have allergies so I tend to forget 😎😎😎
>:(
Let's tie him up and sneeze on him.
Plus pollen means having to pay to clean it off.
"let's uproot all these trees and invade this space. and when the roots of the few remaining trees do what they are supposed to do, let's blame them for 'ruining' human infrastructure!"
trees dont ruin ANY human infrastructure. But the usual urban infrastructure isnt well thought out enough to exist around trees. But smarter urbanism is possible and in fact does exist.
I think you mean all, as this reads more like "nuh uh, trees don't ruin anything"
And those are not the norm, so for places that don't plan to just destroy what's already there and start anew, this is an option
People ruin nature's infrastructure
Bet that algae box will need maintenance too :-)
Every 6 months half of it gets removed, to use as fertiliser, and it is refilled with tap water and some feed.
The roots are something I had not considered