this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
81 points (90.9% liked)

Games

38272 readers
1063 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] icecreamtaco@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No remake is worth monopolizing square's A team for ten years imo. We could have had 17 and 18 by now.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

That's more a consequence of the MMOs sucking up all the oxygen. Plus 15 being fumbled over and over again for nearly a decade.

But there's no lack of talent. What SquareEnix lacks is vision and leadership.

[–] icecreamtaco@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Is it? 11 is on maintenance mode. 14 has its own devteam and they weren't A-listers at the start.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

14 crashed and burned until they brought in the A-Team to reboot it.

I'd say that had a much bigger impact on Dev cycle than a successful release on the first try with 7Remake.

If nothing else, successful releases produce more talented Devs, while failures burn them. And that gets us back to 15, which was an outright dumpster fire.