politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
That's not what I said. There are better ways to fight.
Fight the turly terrible candidate choices, not the ones who you might actually have a chance of working productively with.
Chuck Schumer is abysmal and needs to step down, and he was wrong about the budget. But the essence of his argument has some truth - politics is a two-way street. In the rare case where there is a possibility of cooperation, that sets a better standard and will likely be more effective than endless partisanship.
Things centrists never say about progressives. Because centrists only have intentions of working with their republican buddies to accomplish their mutual goals.
I think you're being understandably but uncessarily cynical for the purposes of this conversation.
I proudly call myself a far-leftist. Even a "woke" one. But victory for the ideals that drive us will not come from endless othering of those who we disagree with. Perfect is the enemy of the good, so the saying goes. I would say it's now the enemy of even just a little bit better as opposed to so much worse.
With that being said, we should never compromise on expressing what we actually believe. I want universal basic income, guaranteed minimum income according to a livable wage, weath taxes, and much more aggressive income taxation of the 1% and 0.1%. I want universal healthcare, open borders, and end to private prisons. But fuck me if I won't vote to make what social security we do have just a little bit better.
As politicians and lawmakers, we need to be the bigger party in the room that doesn't stoop to their level.
I know right now things demand radical defence of democracy, but that doesn't happen by politicians giving up what little power and platform they might have. They can go to work when they're not out on the streets with the protestors.
Every time I think I'm too cynical, democrats prove me wrong. They don't get to come back from supporting a genocide.
But?
Oh yeah. Wouldn't want to other those people who carry swastika flags and chant "Jews will not replace us" after all, they're the only demographic that matters to the democratic party, and they're willing to throw all of us under the bus for a 1% chance at getting a single nazi vote. You're bus fodder just like me and don't you forget it. The femtosecond republicans express the slightest displeasure at your existence, you'll be under the bus with all the disposables you don't consider worth defending because it might other some contemptible nazi.
With every betrayal, democrats converge on expressing what they actually believe.
There is no major party that does not fight against everything you claim to stand for here.
We're dealing with nazis. You don't win over nazis by appeasement. You don't win them over with magnanimity. They do not want to parlay. They want you dead.
Then maybe they should stop giving up whatever power they have every time they have the opportunity to do so.
How would you deal with these Nazis and other fellow Americans who you disagree with? Let's say you're the new president and your party controls both houses of government.
Trump is allowing people to be disappeared to El Salvador. Would you do the same to these people you call Nazis? What about the 45 million or so people who voted for this shit?
I agree the political situation sucks. But solutions aren't easy, and eventually, at the end of the day, we have to be united or there is only war and violence forever.
centrists only want to unite with republicans. They only want to oppose the left.
You don't have to be a centrist to be able to work with people whose priorities are not the same as your own. Most modern democracies actually have fairly healthy cooperation between different political parties who are quite far apart on the issues that matter the most to them.
Democrats spent a year supporting a genocide. How much further to the right do you want them to go?
As though there's a limit.
You seem to be having a different argument to me. Are you abandoning politics altogether then?
I want to see an alternative to the big two as much as anyone. We don't get there through opting out of civic participation.
Armed revolution i.e. civil war will likewise just be a disster. Countless deaths and decades of chaos aren't worth a possibility of something that might be better, if there is any alternative.
This makes absolutely no sense, why not fight both?
Is there a fight limit you don't want them to waste on small fries? Or is their energy limited due to exhaustion from all their paid appearances and campaigning tours.
Name one good reason why they shouldn't be fighting ever single battle!
Why fight when (a) it's not going to change anything and (b) winning the fight gets you a worse outcome.
If it isn't going to change anything but there's a reason to fight on principle, by all means. But fighting for its own sake makes you look stupid and immature.