By Professor Marc Murphy of the Brandeis School of Law
this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
1801 points (99.1% liked)
Political Memes
7916 readers
2180 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's a pretty fucking simple concept, it doesn't need to be "clever".
It's a political cartoon. The cartoon part is supposed to add something that words couldn't.
You're implying this cartoon is good enough to publish which tells me you either haven't seen many political cartoons or you're letting your opinion on the message define if it's good or not.
I think the gold airplane really adds to it, and making it about the twin towers, an event that is solemn and almost untouchable adds to it.
The fact is, if someone has just said, "trump is an airplane, and the Rule of Law/Constitution are the twin towers", we wouldn't be here discussing it. The existence of this thread and anaylsis kinda undermines your point that the cartoon didn't add anything.
If I was the artist's friend and they just pitched that idea to you with that description... I'd suggest workshopping it a bit.
And we're discussing if it's a good cartoon, not the content of it.
Yep. Seems like it did add a lot of things. Glad that is cleared up.
You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how political cartoons work. It's a format for making a statement, there is no requirement for it to "add something that words couldn't". But even in this case, it does. It adds a direct and visceral comparison between what Trump and his Republican cronies are doing to America and what was felt on 9/11.
It's a mediocre cartoon. It's good enough to post on social media but if I'm paying someone to make a cartoon for my paper/website, I'd expect something better than this.
OP says it was rejected for the message being "unfair" and "alarmist", not for any quality reasons. You are entitled to your opinion, but it doesn't have any bearing on why it was rejected.
I never claimed otherwise, though. I said I would have rejected it for being bad and all of my comments have been my opinion on why it's not good.