this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
142 points (99.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2805 readers
1237 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Buddy they're in human trials with the FDA to bring a male pill to the market, and this startup is selling an injection. Idk what you're on about.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Buddy, Vasagel was announced in 2011 and has since not released anything to market. It's been literal decades with nothing on RISUG actually being viable.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One company failed to bring an announced product to market, must be discrimination! The lack of results is proof that they're not trying to solve the problem! Investors are committing capital in 3 different companies to fake interest in the idea in order to continue to oppress women!


Neglect of research into women's healthcare is real, we don't need to invent bogeymen where there isn't one.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Okay, apparently in your world simply pointing out that research was started over a decade ago with no tangible results is oppressing women.

Well good luck with your leaps in logic they and your persecution complex.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

collapsed inline media

Am I missing something here??? You just restated my original point to me as though we're disagreeing with each other.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What? The guy I replied to said "oh where are the products on market, I guess oppressing women is too important". That was literally the point of my comment was how absurdist of a take that was for the same reason you just said.

I think we're simply typing past each other then. My bad.