this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
21 points (83.9% liked)

PC Gaming

10869 readers
297 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

But with those options, your latency is still equivalent to 40fps so it won’t feel any snappier and now you’re introducing artifacts so the image quality is worse. I get upscaling. I don’t get why anyone would ever enable frame gen.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Neither I or the person I was replying to were talking about frame gen.

As for the latency, not in a way that I notice. I'd rather play 80 or more fps upscaled with minute artifacts that I don't notice, than 40 fps native 4k, just as I said. It feels much better to me, even if it's placebo.