this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
25 points (71.2% liked)
Hacker News
1269 readers
295 users here now
Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.
The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Interesting how both mention GIMP. GIMP sucks, but at least it doesn't suck because some developer is pulling your rug, it's mostly the weird interface and lack of features. (At least it doesn't open three windows any more. Like it used to.)
Have you tried 3.0? It's nice and has some good QoL improvements.
3.0 doesn't really change the interface. But there's a good third party overhaul called PhotoGIMP that changes it quite a bit and makes it pretty nice to use.
There's also a plugin called Resynthesizer that adds in the ability to do content aware fill, and the G'mic plugin, which adds hundreds of interesting effects and tools (works with many applications, such as GIMP, Krita, AffinityPhoto, Paint.net, etc)
I did - in fact I have it installed, alongside 2.10. It's better (and non-destructive edition is a godsend!), but it's still clunky to use. I'll give you some examples of what I mean:
And so goes on. Mind you those are examples - GIMP is full of counter-intuitive, counter-productive stuff like this. (I still have a mad respect for the creators of this mess, though; even with all those papercuts and annoyances, the software is functional, and a great piece of libre software. But it's clunky.)