this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
424 points (92.9% liked)

Mildly Interesting

20166 readers
592 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 94 points 2 days ago (20 children)

Looks like the second one is loosely attached, and meant to be stored away as a replacement

https://www.ikea.com/ca/en/p/tronnan-replacement-brush-white-10457027/

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 days ago (19 children)

It’d be nice if there were a lever to help remove the brush. I’d rather not physically manipulate the used brush with my hand.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 5 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I don't think I have ever seen a toilet brush with a lever to eject the brush. I also don't think it solves much. You'd have to wash your hands anyway.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

...say hello to my little friend!..

collapsed inline media

(basically a compact dish scrubbie + bleach detergent embedded into each disposable head: never have to touch the business end to load refills from the caddy nor to eject used scrubbies into the trash)

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Wow, that is really terrible!

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So imagine you use that, would you lick your fingers right afterwards?

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 day ago

...straight back to the prep line at chipotle...

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s the difference between a large and a small pathogenic load. It seems as though everyone here believes themselves to be perfect hand washers when they likely are not. You can reduce the chance of an occurrence, but rarely can you completely negate it.

No, you’d scrub your hands clean after washing the toilet using a toilet brush and gloves because you expect to perform the act many times across your utterly fallible life. Why introduce additional risk and hassle for no benefit? Frankly, obstinately arguing for extra chores, particularly ones involving poop water, doesn’t make sense to me.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just think that the head of the brush is a rather arbitrary threshold for when a toilet brush is considered icky or not. The whole thing, including your hands, go into the toilet when you use it. Being able to detach the brush head hand free is a very small but costly improvement. I'd go as far as calling it a false sense of security.

Also, I wash my butthole when I shower. With my hand.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I think one of us might be doing this wrong, as my hands never go into the toilet.

But you wipe beforehand, right? So there has to be a certain amount of poo you’re willing to accept and a threshold beyond that. I wouldn’t choose to adhere to your poo threshold, is all.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)