this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
252 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

69391 readers
2487 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 77 points 5 days ago (28 children)

The LLM peddlers seem to be going for that exact result. That's why they're calling it "AI". Why is this surprising that non-technical people are falling for it?

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (22 children)

That's why they're calling it "AI".

That's not why. They're calling it AI because it is AI. AI doesn't mean sapient or conscious.

Edit: look at this diagram if you're still unsure:

collapsed inline media

[–] thehatfox@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

In the general population it does. Most people are not using an academic definition of AI, they are using a definition formed from popular science fiction.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

You have that backwards. People are using the colloquial definition of AI.

"Intelligence" is defined by a group of things like pattern recognition, ability to use tools, problem solving, etc. If one of those definitions are met then the thing in question can be said to have intelligence.

A flat worm has intelligence, just very little of it. An object detection model has intelligence (pattern recognition) just not a lot of it. An LLM has more intelligence than a basic object detection model, but still far less than a human.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yes, that's the point. You'd think they could have, at least, looked into a dictionary at some point in the last 2 years. But nope, everyone else is wrong. A round of applause for the paragons of human intelligence.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)