this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
-1 points (0.0% liked)

Privacy

6329 readers
113 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] best_username_ever@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You described ad tracking. Also why is an open source browser wasting time and money to create such a feature that no user needs?

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Its impression tracking, not user tracking and its forced anonymous by design. There’s a few gigantic differences.

And they’re doing it to try and find a better way for advertisers to get some information without having to track everything you do (what happens now)

[–] best_username_ever@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As a user, I don’t need this.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As a user, if this replaces active tracking of your browsing, is that better for you?

Do you need your privacy from web tracking?

Or do you currently love having Google track everything you do?

[–] best_username_ever@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How is tracking better than blocking tracking? What kind of world are you living in?

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

The world where I read the release notes.

Ask yourself the same question?

How is tracking better than a counter?

Currently they’re tracking everything you do. Mozilla thinks they should only get a counter.

Which of those is better?