this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
193 points (96.2% liked)

Selfhosted

46355 readers
374 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] adoxographer@feddit.dk 19 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Are people really doing NAS with SSD? Not just for cache?

[–] alehel@lemmy.zip 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If you live in a small place and dont have massive storage needs, it can make sense for the sake of the quietness.

[–] gaael@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

This. I can't afford reliable always-on storage now, but I plan to build for SSDs rather than HDDs because I don't have a separate room to put it into.

I've been on the lookout for a quiet, inexpensive NAS that I can put under my bed and forget about. I currently have 2x8TB in a mirror, and I'm only using 2-3TB.

In fact, I might even feel comfortable eliminating the RAID w/ SSDs once I clean up our backup strategy (yes, RAID isn't a backup, I know and I feel bad).

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I have a long-term dream to build a fanless SSD-powered NAS

Self-hosted, silent, fast - what's not to love, aside from steep price tag?

[–] sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

SSDs dominant failure modes of catastrophic failure?

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The dominant failure mode of an SSD is to become read-only. There's no data loss there...

[–] sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net 0 points 5 days ago

Depends on the SSD. I've only ever had one SSD become read only, and I've seen a lot of failed SSDs.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 9 points 6 days ago

Yes, for purposes of noise, size, speed and power efficiency

[–] aspoleczny@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

I did, because of energy efficiency and quietness. But also I heavily compromised on the amount of space.

[–] Pyotr@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Yep. Smaller, more energy efficient (extremes expensive electricity here, over 1€/kW at peak time summers), and more temperature resiliant (had to shut the rust based nas down in peak summer months as it could not keep drives cool enough with 3k rpm ippc fans)

11x 4tb drives in mine. Raidz3. Paired with a Xeon and 64gb of ram. All in a 5L case.

I'm considering it. Our storage needs are modest (8TB capacity, 2-3TB stored), our HDDs are getting long in the tooth, and I want to downsize so it can fit under my bed and plug directly into the router (it's currently connecting over wifi). So something relatively inexpensive could convince me to switch.