this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
195 points (96.2% liked)

Selfhosted

46671 readers
456 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 67 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The ME mini features 12GB of LPDDR5-4800 memory, which means the RAM will be soldered to the mainboard and not user upgradeable.

Aaaaand I'm out.

Edit: Hijacking my own comment to update the update

Update: The Beelink ME mini is priced at 1295 CNY in China, which is about $177 at the current exchange rate. It’s likely to cost a bit more outside of China.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah that's just so dumb. Also, i wouldn't be comfortable with the OS on eMMC storage. That's hardly known for reliability. So close and yet so far.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

If it was cost effective maybe but I think this is a bit pricy

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Eh, 12GB is plenty for me. I'm currently using ~3GB out of 16GB, so I'm nowhere close to that cap. My NAS really doesn't do much.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, that's fine if that works for you, but consider more than just your current situation. If you ever wanted to upgrade it or it ever failed sometime in the future, you'd be boned. Personally I have had RAM fail and it cost me about $8 and 10 minutes to repair, rather than several hundred dollars replacing the entire machine.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure. I just don't see myself needing more than 8GB RAM, especially w/ fast NVMe drives as swap. It's a simple NAS running Jellyfin (max 1-2 clients) and a handful of other services.

If I need more RAM, chances are I'll also need more CPU as well, in which case a larger upgrade is in order. If I truly only need more RAM, I could pretty easily move some services to an SBC like a Raspberry Pi.

It's certainly a bummer, but not a deal breaker. If the price is right and I can find inexpensive enough NVMe drives, I can compromise a bit on RAM.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

especially w/ fast NVMe drives as swap

These won't be fast, as detailed in the OP:

Since Intel’s Alder Lake-N processors only have 9 PCIe lanes which have to be shared between the SSDs and other hardware, the M.2 slots include five PCIe 3.0 single-lane connections, and one PCIe 3.0 x2 connection

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

PCIe 3.0 is 1 GB/s per lane. So nothing life changing, but still reasonably fast (way faster a HDD). If you rarely need swap, you should be fine for the few times you do.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

Fair enough, mate. Good luck.