this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
2088 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

68244 readers
4651 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 45 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (34 children)

We need something like Forgejo, but decentralized and federated, like Lemmy. I don't want to create a new account for every Forgejo instance, just to be able to report a bug...

Edit: Added "and federated"

[–] LemonBreezes@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (7 children)

I think that's bad (for my personal use) because if I accidentally commit a secret key, how do I claw it back? Basically, how would I claw anything back if it's on a blockchain aka on thousands/millions of computers already (you can't).

[–] holdstrong@lemm.ee 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

If you push a secret key you should definitely generate a new one. Way to many bots out there that scan new commits for exactly that reason

[–] tehfishman@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah please just rotate the secret if that happens. Doesn't matter what platform it is, this is true of GitHub as well. Secrets that are accidentally published are no longer secret.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)