this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
200 points (99.5% liked)

PC Gaming

13034 readers
582 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teft@piefed.social 26 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Why do they need to get filthy rich? Why not settle for rich and having a good game?

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 36 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

This is the problem with capitalism now. No one is happy making a good profit. They have to extract maximum profit by cutting everything else.

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Capitalism has always been that way. Might be more accurate to say it gets worse when hobby becomes mainstream enough for more money to start flowing into it. Best balance seems to be when something is profitable but niche so corporations consider it not big enough for them to go all in on with their wealth.

Gaming was better when it was some loser hobby in the eyes of society than accepted like it is now causing it to grow to bring in more revenue than movies and music combined. That drew the attention of the vultures.

[–] glups@piefed.social 5 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

They absolutely don't. I'm just wondering why it works out financially for Marvel and Mission Impossible movies but not for games

[–] glups@piefed.social 17 points 18 hours ago

Nevermind, I just remembered Call of Duty exists

[–] MrStankov@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

Movies have a bigger audience, require less time commitment, are heavily marketed, and cost less to see. Easier to convince people to see a so-so movie as long as it has a couple of good scenes. Harder to do with games, and gamers are usually at least somewhat more aware of games before they buy them.

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It is less of an effort and time commitment to passively consume tv shows or movies. You can zombie out while watching it before going to sleep or fall asleep to it.

Games are an active medium in comparison with progression gated behind level of skill, so that makes it less accessible than something like movies or tv shows that is the equivalent of an auto clicker game.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

Because filthy rich is more attractive for capital.