politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Follow the girls leftwards
Instructions unclear, becoming girl.
Task failed successfully
Ehhh.....
50% of white women voted for Trump so really depends on which women you're following
The women going left, obviously
You'd think that would work, but it may be part of the problem. The idea that right wing guys don't get dates doesn't seem to have a lot backing it up. Kind of a new phenomenon to study, but for short term dating, studies on characteristics that seem to be common with far right ideals seem to indicate the opposite.
Short term dating probably isn’t the best metric to determine the long term dating success of right wing men. Who, in my experience and those of everyone I know, are avoided like the plague and need to intentionally hide their politics to get one of those short term dates
The way people define a successful dating life is different, it can be especially skewed in an unhealthy fashion when you're younger and viewing that as a good metric tends to be more popular for men which is who we're talking about here. The key point though is that the numbers we've collected don't seem to be matching when it comes to follow-through. You can find a lot of vague data with 'would you avoid dating' going above 80%, but the ones that collect 'have you dated recently' are still pretty rough but don't tend to get anywhere near that high. Can't understate how rough most of the data here is though. The best we can usually do with real data is correlate negative personality traits you'd expect to be more common with conservatives and extrapolate from that. The data on whether shitty people get laid doesn't look great for us and goes pretty far back comparatively.
I don't think we'll get it any time soon because I think everyone would hate the results and I don't even know how you'd work it or who you'd get to pay for it, but I'd love to see someone try to do a cohesive study on the effect of political stance on an individuals dating life throughout it's entire lifecycle. Even if someone got it going too, we're basically just proving that people make poor relationship decisions which I don't think anyone is going to be surprised by.