this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
-23 points (22.0% liked)

Linux

10784 readers
662 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

am regularly amazed that we pretend folders are the right way to organise files. They’re entirely arbitrary. Every competent file system ignores them to its best ability. Why can’t I have a file in two folders? Why does one have to be a “reference”? Why can’t I filter for files that exist in 3 folders with X extension?

We’ve been played for absolute fools.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 41 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Why can’t I have a file in two folders? Why does one have to be a “reference”?

All files are references. But you have always been able to put a reference to one file in multiple folders by using hard links.

Why can’t I filter for files that exist in 3 folders with X extension?

find dir1 dir2 dir3 -name '*.x' -type f

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 9 points 13 hours ago

Yep. Even NT was doing it for decades. Though it was pretty discouraged on the Microsoft side.