this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
278 points (98.6% liked)
Leopards Ate My Face
8450 readers
1282 users here now
Rules:
- The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
- Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
- If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
- Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
- For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
- Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
- This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
- All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.
Also feel free to check out:
Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Good, cows are bad for the environment and beef is just a corpse you were trained since youth to enjoy.
I'm pretty sure some of that enjoyment is hard coded in our lizard brains.
Sure sure, but why cows and not dogs. Well, dogs are nice to us, so why not cats?
I'm seeing some down votes but nobody willing to step up and say their lizard brain wants to eat a cat. Why is that?
Herbivores pretty consistently taste better than carnivores. Cats also developed a symbiotic relationship with humans when humans developed agriculture.
I don't disagree with your claims, but I doubt the lizard brain cares much about either of them. I'd be more willing to believe the carnivore thing but that just leads to the question: why don't you start salivating when you see a horse. Those tender thighs. That juicy...ummm...I need help with animal parts here. Rump?
Some cultures do eat horses without any taboos. Whether or not your culture does is linked to whether your ancestors cultivated wheat or rice. Wheat cultivating humans bred horses to help with tilling the soil and harvesting the wheat, making them too valuable to eat. Rice cultivating humans needed to cultivate and harvest rice by hand, resulting in horses being used for other things. In both cases, mechanization has resulted in horses being largely obsolete for human uses, but cultural bonds remain and they became pets, particularly in the wheat focused cultures.
I don't disagree with anything in particular you've said here, but I feel like we've deviated pretty heavily from where this started.
Which is that animals are just corpses we're trained since youth to enjoy. To incorporate your point, they're corpses of animal varieties that regional and historical variations have selected due to utility or abundance or whatever.
So to get back to the original original posting, what happens is methane production decreases and some other animal becomes the corpse type which is available due to abundance or utility or whatever.