this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2025
395 points (96.5% liked)

Political Memes

10114 readers
2472 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Communism but within the framework of liberal democracy so the capitalists can simply walk back into power 😩👍🏼

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Nothing more threatening to the power of the proletariat than [checks notes] the proletariat voting.

Like, if we managed to implement a legit socialist state by our current state of bourgeois democracy, as unlikely as that is, the chance of capitalists just 'returning' because people vote in a semi-screwed system is pretty fucking unlikely

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why would it be unlikely every society is going to experience tragedies and down turns. Just then need a strong man backed by a bunch of money. Also think about it. Actually making everyone OK DOES actually cost money. That means that at least some extra taxes are taken from regular people to ensure that those less fortunate or less intelligent or capable are taken care of.

This means there is legit cause for 50%+ of the population to grumble. If everyone is insane to imagine themselves a billionaire most can easily imagine themselves in the top half who would have more if they didn't have to support those insert negative stereotype here.

This is ultimately an insane complaint because ultimately a re-alignment back towards today would involve taking far more from the common man to give to the rich than returning what is taken from the common man and the vast majority would be worse off but the average person is a moron.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This means there is legit cause for 50%+ of the population to grumble.

Should the government not be ran according to the consent of the governed? The solution is not less democracy.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No no no you just don't get it: a rational dialect-materialist examination of civilization proves that our social and economic development is constantly evolving due to unshakable opposing forces.

But if we throw all that away and install a Red Proletariat© government then everything somehow collapses into a happy representative system that is totally stable and can never change. Don't ask any more questions or you're a counter-revolutionary.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ya I'm not a communist I just said that democracy remains and will remain at risk no matter what we achieve.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

My bad, wrong comment chain. Fully agree tho

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Didn't say that we shouldn't just saying that saying failure remains entirely likely

So the solution is to ban factionalism and have the state preëmptively run by an opposing strongman?

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

if we managed to implement a legit socialist state by our current state

How will that happen tho

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Marx loved democracy. He viewed it as the most stable path to communism.

We're seeing this play out more and more in Scandinavia.

Its never been observed in any self proclaimed communist nation with an authoritarian state. Probably because authoritarianism is antithetical to the principles of communism.

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip -1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Scandinavia

You are joking, right?

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Scandinavian countries objectively embody the teachings of Marx greater than any autocratic self proclaimed country.

This is simply reality.

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip -1 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, scandinavian countries who allow corporations to exploit and kill workers in africa so they can fund pensions. Right

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 5 points 19 hours ago

Without democracy, you simply create a new ruling class. Workers had no say in the Soviet Union, even less than they had in the US back then.

[–] Honse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Yes but the alternative is no democracy. Democracy is flawed even when operating correctly, but it the greatest equalizing tool humanity has ever invented, and Marx recognized it