politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
BLUF: you know we can just run someone who authentically wants to help Americans .. Right?
...
It's just unfathomable to you, that we could run someone who authentically will help now that the DNC isn't literally funded by Hillary's personal fundraising machine she built...
Like, are you just unaware of all that?
Yeah...
Mainly due to the fucking CIA, again, both under Republicans and neolibs.
Don't forget, just because we always wait a couple decades to declassify shit, doesn't mean we perpetually just stopped that long ago. There's always a giant backlog of shit they're waiting till we don't care as much.
Clinton flat out told journalists she wouldn't have let Palestine have an election, and the only way she would have, would be if it was rigged:
https://mondoweiss.net/2016/10/palestinian-elections-determine/
But obviously the reason leftwing governments don't work in South America, is the United States of America.
Liars are good at lying...
Again, we could just pick someone that doesn't lie, how is that such an alien concept to you?
And even if that is your logic, how the ever loving fuck do you not understand why voter turnout is a huge problem? And that the fix is just running someone authentic?
The logic in your comment just isn't consistent. The only thing consistent is saying anything in the moment that doesn't make neoliberalism look like the cause. It's literally like talking to a trumpet.
Authentic people say, "Look, we need to do more of this thing. But there are consequences for doing it, and it is going to lead to the following problems. We will have to make tradeoffs."
Voters look at that and the other guy, who promises only good things, and they vote for the other guy.