this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
147 points (97.4% liked)

politics

26807 readers
2787 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 27 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

I still don't understand hating Jews just for their religion. It makes no sense.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 21 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

They hate them because medieval laws allowed Jews to loan money at interest. So the lords and kings would take out the loans to pay for their armies and then incite a pogrom when the loan payment came due.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 8 hours ago

I think I remember reading that similar laws placed Jews in other industries seemed as dirty, such as legal and medical fields. By happenstance those ended up being very desirable as society changed. Jews were often persecuted and blamed for a lot of social ills in that era, that, in addition to resisting cultural assimilation, meant they kept in fairly insulated communities, which made it easier to put them in the category of "outsider".

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

What's even crazier is when you realize the main three (Islam, Judaism, Christianity) all literally worship the same God. They just disagree on prophets.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

I find it hilarious when I say that on various forums and often it's the xtians that usually object that they worship Allah.

Usually I do this in the context of explaining how using the term "God" as a stand-in for their god (meaning: Jehovah/Allah/Yahweh) is so very provincial and presumptuous.

Sometimes I've had a few Jews try to claim that Jehovah/Allah/Yahweh are not the same entity, and also that using the full name of their god is something I should not do because it's "offensive". I realize that xtianity and Islam are both retcons that both claim their legitimacy based on the OT, but for some reason, pointing this obvious fact out is something some people pretend to be offended by. In any case, I point out these rules are for the adherents of book clubs, not for others who have not opted into these book clubs. Being "offended" by someone using the full name of a fictional entity is therefore a choice.

I, for one, refuse to play along with their game of assuming the use of [g|G]od automatically means the Abrahamic one...

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Tribalism, control, and wealth-accumulation?

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

the same god

So... Money?

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Something something killed Christ. Meh. Vance is such a spineless weasel.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'm an atheist, so that tracks.

Since Christians believe that Christ died for their sins, wouldn't that ruin their whole shtick if he hadn't been killed?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 10 points 10 hours ago

Its storytelling to build community, not something rational

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Maybe two things. Have you spent significant time as an outsider in a way that you couldn't change and wasn't going to change ? Being on the incontrovertible receiving end can make it clearer that the motives are that of being human beings. This is what human beings do.

And religion, though not so important for lots, is still really important to other lots. I would see the blind spot in underestimating the power of religion in the 21st century.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Yeah... I'm an atheist. From my perspective, religion seems silly at best, and malignant at worst (when used to justify truly evil acts)