this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
217 points (98.2% liked)

science

23084 readers
451 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'd rather not be test subject number 3. But if others do then I'm OK with that, and over time as more people try them we can get a sense of their safety and effectiveness. Are side effects like that common with vaccines?

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

You need lots of test subjects, control groups, "blind tests". And someone need to manage everything so it can be done in a controlled environment.

It's really not as simple as just having a bunch of people testing it. You introduce placebo that way. Which the "official" process eliminates through their control groups and by injecting nothing but saline solutions while telling you it's the real deal.

Or rather. You are made aware you may or may not recieve the real deal. You just don't know.

Those side effects are not common. Because they would be unacceptable and "eliminated" before moving on to human trials. I put that in quotation marks because there's probably a non zero risk. Just astronomically small.

Example. People have been observed getting drunk on non alcoholic drinks. But they're not really drunk, they just think they are.