politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
"You can't colonize Greenland, that's our colony!"
Well they've decided themselves that they want to be a mostly independent colony, and work towards being able to take care of themselves. Greenland knows that they can't take care of themselves as an independent nation right now, but Denmark and Greenland are trying to change that. The danish government has said multiple times that Greenland can become independent if they want to, they just know it'd be a bad idea right now.
They really aren't trying to change it. Greenland has zero practical path to independence from Denmark. They are still firmly a colony, one that Denmark fights very hard to keep under their thumb.
"She can leave anytime she wants but she knows what will happen if she does"
Real abusive husband vibes there. Obviously the US should not attempt to take over any part of Greenland but the argument you're making sounds more like a hostage situation than anything else.
This is more like a teen who is working towards independence. You may just be a troll, but I will elaborate a tiny bit. Surely you understand a country needs infrastructure, trade relationships and something to trade, and enough population, structure and industry to support these endeavors. Greenland is still developing these necessities. Like a parent Denmark is supporting and protecting teen Greenland while this process continues.
They would have more population if Denmark hadn't practiced eugenics against the native population. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/hundreds-of-greenlandic-women-and-girls-were-forcibly-given-contraception-between-1960-and-1991-report-says
They only stopped giving native women contraceptives against their will...in the 1990s.
I don't know enough about the situation to have a real opinion on the matter. All I'm saying is that what I'm hearing as the justification for Denmark keeping control of Greenland sounds just like the logic that many kinds of abusers use to justify their controlling behavior. It's theoretically possible that it's 100% true in this case but my previous experience with that kind of language says that is unlikely.
There is a difference between geopolitics and abusive partners, what a shocker.
That's true. Most abusers don't have millions of people who make excuses for their shitty behavior.
The funny thing is, if I happened to have made this comparison in reference to the US, Russia, China, or Israel I bet you would be reacting pretty differently right now.
And it's a really stupid take.
Ok
But in this situation, it would an abusive neighbor (the US) who has threatened to kidnap you if you leave. And police don't exist, so it would be up to your husband or anyone else to physically come get you back.