this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2025
666 points (99.6% liked)

politics

26779 readers
2077 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 55 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Because no one cares about Pam Bondi, but the American people care about the Epstein files

Who's going to defend her? She made the administration look bad while also pissing off the public

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 25 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

In n particular, MAGA care about the Epstein files. This is a major crack in their coalition. They spent years throwing around conspiracy theories about pedophile cults secretly running the world. They are obsessed with the Epstein files, and the more Trump tries to obfuscate their contents, the more they have to start wondering what his skin in the game is. We're already seeing it happen with people like MTG publicly turning on him.

It's still a cult. They don't want to suspect dear leader of anything. But the more he works to conceal stuff, the more they're trapped between two things they hold at absolute truths. One of them has to give eventually.

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I’d dearly love to believe you but if any group of people are champions of managing cognitive dissonance without addressing it, it’s the MAGA crowd.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I have yet to see the limit of MAGA voters' stupidity, but I hope you are right.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Who’s going to defend her?

More pressing, who is going to prosecute her? To date, I've seen zero impulse under any prior administration to prosecute the wrongdoing of outgoing officials.

The closest case has been the half assed effort to get Leticia James on... misreporting a mortgage statement?

Nobody at the highest levels of government and business actually want to fuck with one another. It is always and forever punching down on the plebs.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Congress. They can just impeach her

I mean she could refuse to leave, but then she'd be committing all sorts of crimes on a daily basis

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I mean she could refuse to leave, but then she'd be committing all sorts of crimes on a daily basis.

Now Trump definitely won't fire her. He loves criminals who do crimes for him.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

No, Trump loves Trump. Everyone else is useful until they're not, at which point they get thrown under the bus or conveniently commit suicide.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 12 hours ago
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 13 hours ago

No he doesn't... He doesn't give a shit about them. He's abandoned so many loyalists it's crazy

He talks shit about them even. He relishes when they get punished in his name

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They can just impeach her

Hasn't Trump been impeached twice already?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but really no.

They impeached him, which is the name of the procedure to remove an official from office, but then they didn't have the Senate votes to remove him from office

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

they didn’t have the Senate votes to remove him from office

When has anyone ever?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Us, right now?

This isn't a unicorn. Literally the entire Senate voted to release the Epstein files, that unanimously passed law in the Senate was not followed

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Literally the entire Senate voted to release the Epstein files

Well aware that they'd be redacted down to nothing

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's not going away. Why do you think Congress members have resigned this post month? It's not because they care, it's because they realize being an incumbent is a liability at this point

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of the Congresscritters resigning are eyeing higher offices now that they've secured a pension through their five year term of service in the House.

And while this is certainly a shit year for Republican incumbents, the gerrymandering favors Republicans long term. They'll be back, and in greater number, in '28 or '30.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Gerrymandering gives a 5-10 point advantage. If can backfire, and I think it's going to

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Year to year can backfire. Long term it is an enormous benefit