this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
430 points (90.1% liked)

World News

51389 readers
1187 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US President Donald Trump signed the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law Thursday, completing the passage of the largest military spending bill in US history—$901 billion, or over $1 trillion when combined with supplemental funding passed earlier this year.

The Senate voted 77-20 on Wednesday to pass the bill. The Democratic leadership, including Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York and Minority Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois, voted for the bill. They were joined by Senators Mark Kelly of Arizona and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, both of whom released a video last month calling on military personnel to disobey illegal orders—as Trump was sending the US military on a murder spree off the coast of Latin America.

Citing Trump’s statements about using troops to shoot protesters in America, Slotkin invoked the legacy of the Nuremberg tribunals, which convicted Nazi leaders for war crimes and crimes against peace. But when it came time to vote, this invocation was revealed to be completely meaningless. Slotkin voted to hand Trump the resources to pursue his military adventure against Venezuela...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why not? Apparently that's how MAGA thinks things should be handled. They should be happy to see Dems adopting the same strategy.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why not? Because the world is at the precipice of WWIII due to the USA's diplomacy going limp and heavy aggression from Russian and Chinese expansionism. Whatever tens of millions suffer because of Republican letting social safety nets falter, which is not mutually exclusive mind you, is nothing compared to the amount of suffering caused if hostilities broke into US backed nations and states across the pacific.

It's one thing to say "we should spend less on military" or "the military should be able to pass audits", but to say "defund the US military" is some clear Tankie propaganda shit of the highest order.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not advocating for dismamtling the military, but I do think we should hamstring the MAGA traitors as much as possible. Only a small minority of Americans truly support these PedoCon Traitors, and we shouldn't allow them to turn the entire world against us. Limiting their use of the military via budget and legislation and courts is the responsible thing to do for the future of our country.

Once America is back in the responsible hands of sane adults, we can talk about re-establishing a reasonable military budget.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

These pedocon traitors are the majority in congress. They write the offers and we either have a military budget or we don't. There is no middle ground we can claim.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

That doesn't mean they have to vote for it. They can refuse, and the MAGAs can pass it on their own. The Dems are under no obligation to support ANYTHING the MAGAs do.

For this entire administration, there shouldn't be a single Dem vote for ANY MAGA legislation. Force them to win with MAGA votes only. I'm keeping track of DINO appeasers, and will be loudly calling them out for their disloyalty to their constituents, and supporting their primary opponents. One of them is my own guy, who is as weak as any DINO I've ever seen. He needs to go.

And if it means our military doesn't have funding for the next year, they can blame the MAGA majority, who didn't vote for it, not Dems, who are obligated to oppose ALL MAGA legislation.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They don't have to vote for continuing to have a military budget, thats right, but they fucking should because thats unfortunately something we need as a result of eastern bloc aggression.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago

They've been using it to support Gaza Genocide, and to hold a hammer over Zelensky's head, and to threaten American citizens, so they have too much.

Nobody is coming for us, and if they do start getting froggy, we can release enough dough to get through, but not enough for MAGA to start thinking they can fund a war of corruption.

When we have responsible people, and not toddlers, handling the guns, we'll give them some bullets.