this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10776 readers
345 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A train an hour seems reasonable to me at this point. I think a train every 20 minutes would result in a lot of empty trains. Good to have extra capacity for the future though.

I really hope they don't wait decades to build the other half the line once Toronto-Quebec City is done. Windsor itself may not be big enough to drive major traffic, but I'd bet that if you put stops in Kitchener and London, those two would be very busy.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they build it (well), and make it reasonable cost to use, it will get used. People will adapt to the easier and quicker connections of the cities and the demand will rise to the supply. Unfortunately this means it won't reduce traffic anywhere. But it will be good for business.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well, I don’t know about reasonable cost. In the EU, high speed rail is more expensive than flying. But it’s also significantly better and faster than flying.