this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
231 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26717 readers
2207 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said there will not be an amendment vote on extending expiring ObamaCare enhanced subsidies as part of a House Republican health care bill this week, in a move that is infuriating moderate Republicans who had been pushing to go on the record about the subsidies.

Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), one of the members who had been pushing for a vote to extend the subsidies that expire Dec. 31, fumed at the decision as he emerged from a House Republican Conference meeting Tuesday morning.

“I think it’s idiotic not to have an up-or-down vote on this issue,” Lawler said, adding: “It is political malpractice.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 139 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

so blinking on the shutdown confirmed useless. super.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 74 points 22 hours ago

who could have predicted this?!?

collapsed inline media

[–] immutable@lemmy.zip 36 points 22 hours ago

Not completely useless it allowed the republicans to have a talking point that the democrats were obstructing for no reason.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 23 points 20 hours ago

Less than useless. Actually harmful. The shutdown itself hurt working families and they caved because they knew people would suffer next year with no subsidies. If they were gonna cave anyway they should never have started the shutdown. It was just for press so they can tie themselves to the idea of lower healthcare. In lieu of helping people now they are letting them suffer on the hope that if they suffer enough they'll vote blue. It's disgusting and transparent.

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

What worries me most is their acting like they don’t worry about the midterms … how?!

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 13 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

People are deeply stupid.

The Left will inevitably start getting pissy that their candidates didn't win primaries and sit out the generals. And the conservatives will get brainwashed into thinking all the problems were a time bomb left by Barack HUSSEIN Obama.

And... it is increasingly looking like there might be good odds that trump is dead by then and president vance (and now I threw up in my mouth a bit) is sacrificed as "undoing all the good trump did and why you need to vote for hegseth in 2028"

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Also at this stage they know they will just fix the vote if things aren't swinging their way. They don't give a rats ass about the law anymore.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 21 hours ago

Vote fixing is not that easy.

Massive landslide victories will be far too obvious. I am not sure if there is a "Your honor, this is clearly bullshit" clause for recounts but it will trigger them.

As for the closer stuff? Yes, electronic voting is deeply stupid and dangerous. But it is also worth understanding that many systems are still built around a paper ballot that you feed into it. And those will show massive discrepancies. ESPECIALLY in the "blue states" where these wins would most matter.

For a presidential election? I could see a world where very targeted election fraud could MAYBE be pulled off, but I stand by: can you imagine the chuds and musk NOT bragging about outright fraud?

But for midterms and anything down ballot? The places that matter most are the ones where republicans don't control the state government in its entirety. And when the recount is like 20% different than the reported vote?

Nah. Election fraud is the distraction. They'll just perform, ANOTHER, violent insurrection and take the government by force.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If you rig the elections enough you don't have to worry.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Or you just cancel them because something something "antifa".

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 6 points 22 hours ago

Rigged elections. Republican super donor company bought dominion voting machines. Just one example.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Obviously they have a plan for that

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You think there will be midterms.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 2 points 18 hours ago

There will absolutely be midterms, just like how Russia has elections. They go through the motions and report the results they want.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 5 points 22 hours ago

As was foretold by the deep magic.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Listen, you got what you voted for. Maybe the next time you're forced to choose between pay your bloated premiums or your bloated deductibles and copays, you'll remember this moment and vote differently.

I'm just going to sit here, smugly, and enjoy my Italian citizenship and complementary public health care system.

[–] SantasMagicalComfort@piefed.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I hope the Italian healthcare system is doing better than it was in 2020.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You want us to check the COVID leaderboard?

If Italy was a US state it would be 21st best of the 51 right between Iowa and Illinois in deaths per million.