this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
64 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10761 readers
466 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If you take the top 10 billionaires in Canada, and take every single bit of value they have and manage to get every single dollar while doing so. You would still only give each Canadian $3000.

Once.

I'm not pro-billionaire, but if instead, you took every single piece of residential property in Canada, and took that value and divided it between all Canadians, each person would get $212,500.

The biggest problem with distribution of wealth in this country is not the billionaires, it's the appreciated property values of real estate and the vast majority of those are your standard every day Boomer house.

[–] healthetank@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'm confused - are you arguing for lower property values as a driving method to reduce COL, or for trying to redistribute housing prices?

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

The argument is that it's not billionaires causing the primary issues with affordability.

It's almost entirely the pyramid scheme that is the 8.5 trillion dollar real estate market, which is majority owned by the average Canadian citizen, not corporations and billionaires.

I mean feel free to eat the rich at the same time, but if we want to make things affordable and our economy competitive again for anything, we NEED to reduce property values.

Currently, my home consumes approximately 45% of the combined wages of my wife and I, and we're lucky enough to have it half paid off already. If we dropped the cost of housing significantly, it would hurt the equity of everyone, but also it would mean that I could work for a lower wage, and still take home more disposable income.

An 80% drop in real estate values could mean paying me 30% less and me still being ahead financially, especially once you account for the multi-stage effects where most of the things I buy are made using land and labour, both of which would now be cheaper, so the prices of most products (like food) could drop too.

All of that would need significant government regulation during the transition period to ensure companies play nicely, but it's totally possible.