this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
58 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

10723 readers
293 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ategon@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev
58
GCC Developers Considering Whether To Accept AI/LLM-Generated Patches (www.phoronix.com)
submitted 1 week ago by cm0002@literature.cafe to c/linux@programming.dev
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) developers now have a need to set a policy whether AI / Large Language Model (LLM) generated patches will be accepted for this open-source compiler stack.

The GCC compiler doesn't currently have a policy in place whether to permit AI/LLM-generated patches. But within a bug report today there is a patch posted by a user in trying to fix a GCC 16 compiler regression.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] frongt@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If it's maintainable, I don't think there's an issue (aside from the usual license violations in LLM training). The big problem is when people send giant unmaintainable patches that they can't even explain themselves.

[โ€“] mech@feddit.org 21 points 1 week ago

No, the license violations are the main problem.
AI will steal all publicly visible code regardless of its license as "training data" and then put out the same code almost verbatim when asked to solve the same problem. And projects need to prevent that to avoid costly legal battles they can't afford.