this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
319 points (98.8% liked)

politics

26738 readers
2729 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A series of events in the past few weeks has undercut what little power Johnson ever had among his fellow Republicans in the House. GOP representatives – the group that he theoretically leads – are so angry that they publicly call him names. Republicans are using parliamentary procedures to get votes on bills that Johnson doesn’t want to bring to the floor.

Incumbents panicking over the potential to lose their seats, in a Democratic landslide, are blaming Johnson for their problems. He has to make promises he must know he can’t keep to get bills passed. And Donald Trump is doing nothing to help Johnson in his time of need.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 57 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Maybe Trump's plan is to eject Johnson, get Republicans in the House to elect him to be Speaker, hold both positions at the same time (because who's gonna tell him he can't? His handpicked Supreme Court?), then simply refuse to acknowledge the results of the election if it goes South for him.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fuck it, does the constitution say you have to be a different person from the vice president? Might as well go for the trifecta

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Please someone give me a reason he can't nominate himself to the Supreme Court if a seat is vacant.

There's technically no such thing as a "vacant" seat. The constitution dictates a Supreme Court and justices but not how many. They could nominate and seat twenty more justices tomorrow.

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 14 points 3 days ago

I mean it would be fucking awful but somehow it would be wonderfully true to the sentiment history rhymes, as Hitler combined the chancellor position and the presidency in Germany together and was from then on the Führer.

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I feel like Huey P. Long did something very similar to this. We'll see how it all plays out for the president.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hopefully it ends the same way. Soon.

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

With two generations of his family members coming in after and stealing everything that isn't nailed down?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There's precedent that says nobody can hold two elected offices at the same time. Does that apply to the speakrship?

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Precedent? What’s that? I think Donald John Trump just nominated himself to the Supreme Court and the Senate is slated to approve it.

What’s that you say? They can’t do that? Well Chief Justice Trump says it’s constitutional.

Edit: On a serious note, Speaker is not an elected position. IIRC it’s all made up and the House can choose however they want, including games of chance.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is literally elected but ok

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago

It’s chosen by the members of the house, however they see fit. Majority vote by members is just how they chose to do it:

“Clause 5 Impeachment The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.”

It is not an election by the people

Didn't the USSC say that the president isn't an office though? I want whatever drugs they on