this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
477 points (99.0% liked)

Linux

10784 readers
933 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The GNOME.org Extensions hosting for GNOME Shell extensions will no longer accept new contributions with AI-generated code. A new rule has been added to their review guidelines to forbid AI-generated code.

Due to the growing number of GNOME Shell extensions looking to appear on extensions.gnome.org that were generated using AI, it's now prohibited. The new rule in their guidelines note that AI-generated code will be explicitly rejected

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brian@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

did you read their statement? they do.

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, it says there was an unnecessary try/catch, that's pretty weak if that's the only reason.

[–] foenkyfjutschah@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

read their text again, the problem is that people submit code that they don't understand. and this will grow the more people decide to stay stupid / employ LLMs.

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well that's an assertion they are claiming, maybe. I see people on lemmy claim that all of the time about people who use LLM tools but thinking a thing doesn't make it fact.

Edit: I just reread the blog and actually see zero mention of that claim. So I'm not sure where you're reading that I'm not seeing.