this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
856 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

8725 readers
1044 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] licheas@sh.itjust.works 59 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (34 children)

saying so in front of the daughter is low key savage.

But it always boggles my mind when adults are shocked and horrified that predators ...predate. Especially non-vegans.

Like Bro. Hommie needs to eat, and they can't live off beans. (well, maybe coyotes can.)

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 24 points 1 day ago (21 children)

I'm glad I wasn't Disney'd in childhood. Better to know reality, than be deluded, made fragile and crippled by reality. Face the horror. Stop lying to children. Children become adults.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 25 points 1 day ago (20 children)

Grow up on a farm and you really have no delusions about how the world works. Although I did think teachers lived at the school so I was unclear with how Mrs Thatcher got pregnant.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I mean you grew up believing that it's healthier to eat meat rather than just more profitable to sell it, or that it is morally defensible in any way to create an intelligent creature and then force it into a state of utter lifelong dependency just so that you can exploit its biological processes, so I wouldn't be so sure about that "no delusions" thing. You're on your own supply.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 4 points 21 hours ago

that it is morally defensible in any way to create an intelligent creature and then force it into a state of utter lifelong dependency just so that you can exploit its biological processes

Interestingly, I don't have issue with people who hunt for meat (provided they follow generally accepted responsible hunting practices), but I have a big fucking issue with animal agriculture.

The quoted section is the distinguishing factor. Creating sentient life for the explicit purpose of exploiting it really rubs me the wrong way.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Humans are part of nature too, and we have our animal instincts same as any other animal. Only thing that differs is our capacity to self-reflect and exercise agency over our place in the ecosystem. What matters is that we have respect for life and don't take it for granted. I agree that factory farms, hunting for sport or luxury goods like furs, etc. is wrong, but I don't see a problem with a small farm raising some animals as long as they're treated with respect and given a comfortable life. All animals - including us - are dependent on others for survival.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Humans are part of nature too

Meaningless appeal to nature. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_nature

No one who breeds, murders, and butchers animals (or who pays to have those things done) has respect for life. You are lying to yourself so that you don't have to see yourself as a bad person. There is a better way not to see yourself as a bad person.

Farms do not "raise" animals. When you raise a child, you prepare it for life. A farm animal does not go on to enjoy life, they are killed in their absolute prime, because that is when the product is at its best. It's absurd that these lies are convincing to you, but we are eager to believe certain lies, aren't we?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

it's not being used fallaciously

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 16 hours ago

You kidding me? I only eat meat because it is cooked, and is what is available. I tried to secretly go vegan.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

The mother of the last pig you ate was perfectly capable of raising her own young. But a farmer took that ability from her by locking her in a cage that was so fucking small, she could not even turn around or roll over. That's how a fucking farmer "raises" a fucking piglet. Enrichment? Meeting emotional needs? Basic medical attention for injuries? No. You are put in a cage so small you cannot move, until you die.

The lies you tell yourself are disgusting. Keep them to yourself.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

you don't actually know any of that. your guessing.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

it is morally defensible ... to ... exploit ...biological processes

and I won't pretend it's not

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I mean you grew up believing that it's healthier to eat meat rather than just more profitable to sell it

Seriously I've read this about 10 times and I still have no idea what you're going on about. It's healthier to eat meat than sell it, what?

it is morally defensible in any way to create an intelligent creature

What absolute grammar hellhole is this? What animal are you thinking of?

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 hours ago

It's honestly not that hard, but you still managed to get it exactly backwards. Maybe with that hint you'll finally figure it out.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)