this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
553 points (99.5% liked)

politics

26703 readers
2162 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They happily voted for a guy who had a health care policy that amounted to “concepts of a plan” for like a decade now.

They were the same guys voting for Romney in 2012, the man whose health plan was good enough for Obama to crib wholesale.

I can’t think of a single time from last election season where this was agreed upon as a bipartisan issue.

Joe Biden Has Advocated Cutting Social Security for 40 Years

What Bloomberg campaign?

He's the thirteenth most prolific campaign financier in 2024

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They were the same guys voting for Romney in 2012, the man whose health plan was good enough for Obama to crib wholesale.

Yeah, and then you fucking dumbasses started calling it "communism" and yelling about "death panels". Did you forget? If you're proud of that achievement, why did you reject it entirely four years later?

You're seriously trying to act like we stole what you think was a good idea after the way you acted? You've got to be fucking kidding me. Are you seriously trying to pretend that Republicans support nationwide universal healthcare? No one can be that stupid.

I don't understand what you think you're supporting with the Biden link. Your assertion was Republicans somehow didn't bring about the situation they currently face. Did you forget, you fucking dumbass?

You seriously just some random thing that in no one supports your argument. You're to pretend you never made that argument to begin with. I don't even know what to say, how the fuck does that dispute the text you put it under?

You said that he "runs the party" and your link his 13th? How fucking stupid can you be? How is being 13th give him unilateral control over the party?

Stop making ridiculous you can't even remotely support, it's just fucking sad.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

you fucking dumbasses started calling it “communism”

Oh sure. That was half the joke of 2009. Insurance lobbyists going on TV and predicting America would become Venezuela for getting subsidized private coverage.

And Democrats were happy to play along. Lieberman filibustered the Public Option from within his own party because the TV news made the bill so unpopular

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Financing and campaigning are two different things, though there's an obvious link.