this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
494 points (94.0% liked)

Bluesky

1783 readers
428 users here now

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18107@aussie.zone 22 points 1 day ago (21 children)

I think it's a perfectly valid review. It is stupid and racist, but that's clearly on the reviewer and not the developer.

With any rating system you'll always get someone leaving a negative rating without valid reason. At least with this one, anyone who reads it knows they can ignore it.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I used to work for a company that made blinds that people could order online and would then have to put up themselves and one person left a negative review because they dropped the set of blinds on their head while trying to install it.

The owner was delighted because it was such a stupid 1 star review. Anyone reading it would just laugh at the person leaving the review and wouldn't think negatively of the company.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Of course the problem is that the review influences the overall score, and people won't know why the poor review, they'll just know that the number is impacted.

Of course, that says, if that is someone's review, they can just only or make something up to have that impact.. only hope is for things to be well under the lizardman's constant.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I think steam top and tails the reviews, so if anything is way out of range it doesn't count towards the score, or at least it's impact is reduced. It not as simple as an average of the scores.

load more comments (18 replies)