this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
42 points (86.2% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

8356 readers
868 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'll give the author a modicum of credit, I didn't know wood banks were a thing, so at least I learned something. But gotta lambast them everywhere else.

Rural America knows the truth long before the rest of the country feels it.

Rural America wouldn't know the truth if it bit them in the ass. This is what they voted for, a silver spoon city slicker who calls functioning institutions "the deep state" before totally destroying them, to their delight.

The article is full of this coddling "woe is they" language.

Rural families don’t get to pretend. ... They also know what it means when everything gets privatized except the consequences.

What a load of baloney. Rural voters have been playing pretend my entire life, to the tune of 64% support for Trump in 2024. They've been pretending that piss-down economics works since the 80's. Maybe you mean they can't afford to pretend, but they've been happily running a deficit on that front and won't stop even if they freeze in the winter.

So I say let them freeze. They can beg for scrap wood and call it charity, because that's exactly what they wanted.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

That was some excellent sea lioning there buddy.

I feel fully morally justified in having people experience what they want others to experience. I'm also fine with that applying to me.

And since you're substituting outrage for intelligence, I'll provide an example.

Person A thinks that social safety nets should be removed for the express purpose of making Person B to suffer. Taking this action causes person A to suffer the effect of their own action.

Person C thinks that if you want others to suffer, you should suffer. Taking this action causes... Nothing because it is a purely reactive stance that doesn't do anything unless triggered by a second party.

Similarly, I think that if you take someone's money that you should be punished, for example by someone taking your money.

The fact that you don't understand this is honestly rather baffling. Or you're just enjoying sealioning to make everyone who isn't on your side of the argument look bad.