this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
128 points (92.7% liked)

Not The Onion

18900 readers
2039 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Funnily enough, I actually work in an agency that's very close to Philly and deal with my counterparts in the city fairly regularly.

I don't get (or want) to listen to a whole lot of PPD radio chatter, we have plenty in our own county to keep us busy, so I don't know for certain if they're actually still using 10-codes or any other similar system or not. I can't think of any time I've heard a Philly officer or dispatcher use one with me, but it's certainly possible that they're still in use there internally.

Also even though we're using plain language, there's still some weird miscommunication that happens.

I remember one time needing to advise Philly of a report of gunshots we received that might have been relevant to them, it was near their border.

So I called over to their dispatch and advised them that "we received a report of shots fired in the area of..."

Which kind of sent their dispatcher into a bit of a tizzy because in Philly dispatch lingo "shots fire" basically means an officer has fired their gun, but to us it's just any report of gunshots (which, more often than not, means fireworks or something that the caller mistook for gunshots)

[–] Deebster@programming.dev 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like perhaps unified codes would be the answer to that problem!

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

It is and it isn't

Certain things absolutely need to be standardized

But in other cases it can just kind of bog things down.

I remember one training thing we had to do to keep our certifications up to date, part of it had to do with fire dispatch.

And at the beginning of that, our instructor basically said "Almost nothing in this course is at all relevant to us. But it's a national standard and we have to teach this to you"

It had a lot to do with wildland firefighting and some other specific situations that have nothing to do with how things operate in our area or with the kinds of situations we deal with.

It was interesting, I learned some fun facts, but I haven't yet had any reason to use any of the knowledge I picked up from that training.

And that time could have probably been better spent doing something else.