this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
87 points (100.0% liked)

World News

51231 readers
1982 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] socsa@piefed.social 1 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

This is dumb. Write a drunk in public, sure, but a drunk cyclist isn't a danger to anyone but themselves.

[–] nailingjello@piefed.zip 9 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

It sounds like you are saying that if a drunk cyclist hits a pedestrian, it's impossible for the pedestrian to get injured.

Or if that same cyclist weaves out in to the street, a car that hits them cannot be damaged (and the driver of the car won't be held liable even though cyclists pretty much always have the right of way vs. cars).

[–] socsa@piefed.social 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Cyclists injure fewer pedestrians per year than sidewalks do.

[–] nailingjello@piefed.zip 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for confirming my assumptions above. I don't agree.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

How can you disagree with a recorded fact? 🙄

[–] nailingjello@piefed.zip 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Based on their comment above I asked if the following assumptions were correct. They appeared to confirm them:

It sounds like you are saying that if a drunk cyclist hits a pedestrian, it's impossible for the pedestrian to get injured.

Or if that same cyclist weaves out in to the street, a car that hits them cannot be damaged (and the driver of the car won't be held liable even though cyclists pretty much always have the right of way vs. cars).

Are you saying there are recorded facts that agree with their assumptions? Could you please provide a source?

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 1 points 6 hours ago

No, I'm saying cyclists injure fewer pedestrians per year than sidewalks do, which is what your disagreeing comment appeared to be replying to. It's a recorded fact that cyclists injure fewer pedestrians per year than sidewalks. For my country, that's in the Recorded Road Casualties of Great Britain dataset.

I replied about your assumptions in another comment.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 4 points 16 hours ago

Not impossible, but very very rare in practice.

And whether the driver is liable varies around the world. Most countries require drivers not to hit dumb animals, including drunk humans.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 hours ago

What? If some drunken fuck rams into me on a bike, then I'll l get injured.

[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

If its like Australia, then its probably because the way the legislation is worded.

If the DUI legislation has demerit point accumulation for DUI, and it covers all vehicles, not just motor vehicles, then drunk cycling or horse riding could also result in a loss of licence.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Cyclists here in Japan flaunt all the rules and ride like maniacs (illegally in most cases) on the sidewalks (and also illegally with earphones and staring at their phones). Pedestrians have absolute right-of-way and the cyclist is at fault for hitting them. Add to this generally high density and bad spacial awareness and it's bad without drunks. Absolutely keep people from drinking off the cycles.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

I dunno about what part of Japan you're in but what grinds my gears in Okinawa is how they NEVER use their damn bells to let me know they're approaching me from behind.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

Could hurt other cyclists and pedestrians, especially other cyclists of going fast