this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
125 points (100.0% liked)

Buy European

7733 readers
866 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] foliumcreations@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is what makes it hard as a consumer to be conscious of our choices. Sometimes, it feels like a Dirac equation. For the sake of this example, let's say that we only have a choice between faux leather and leather coats. We can also say that suffering is a constant.

If leather were only a by-product of an already existing industry, should the environmental cost of rearing be included in the impact? If the chemicals used in tanning have a greater immediate negative environmental impact than faux leather, should that weigh heavier than the plastics' impact over time?

Let's say faux leather has a lower immediate and long-term impact. However, it's less durable, even with proper care, resulting in needing to be replaced every year instead of once every 5 to 10 years. But then we have to take price into account. What if leather costs significantly more even with replacements factored in? Would that require more labor? Does the means of generating capital itself produce a worse environmental impact?

I sometimes struggle with choosing tomatoes.

The example was not to argue one over the other, but to explain what I meant in my initial comment. It doesn't feel like a given that recycled plastics are the best choice for the environment. My assumptions might also be completely wrong.

[โ€“] maam@feddit.uk -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's why I used the phrase: "if leather were a by-product"

I was simplifying the sake of the example.