86
Valve CEO Gabe Newell’s Neuralink competitor is expecting its first brain chip this year
(www.theverge.com)
this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
86 points (96.7% liked)
Technology
4867 readers
412 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Post guidelines
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There are many many good reasons for developing the technology. It's so bleeding edge though only some people will try it. Billionaires who don't need to ask anyone else are some of the most likely people to be doing this.
But there have already been incredible strides made with some of the projects that have had human trials.
Where I think we all need to really put them under the spotlight is what do they do for the people who got these when the companies shit the bed? Whomever gets this tech needs to be taken care of. This isn't something they should be allowed to walk away from if they don't like the direction the research takes or if they just decide they no longer want to develop it. And think that line of responsibility is exactly at human trials .
If they start, they shouldn't be allowed to stop.
Some readings for those interested in it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Harbisson?wprov=sfla1
https://futurism.com/health-medicine/paralyzed-first-person-shooter-brain-implant
https://spectrum.ieee.org/bionic-eye-obsolete
https://www.vox.com/unexplainable/411102/neuroscience-technology-consumer-products-safety-maintenance