this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
446 points (98.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

27817 readers
1912 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tux0r@feddit.org 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I renamed my master branch slaveowner. To make it more clear.

It is software, my friends. It’s not a tribe of people.

[–] cenzorrll@piefed.ca 18 points 3 days ago (4 children)

You could do that, but I could argue that master/slave nomenclature isnt a good scheme for this anyway, since it doesn't control any other branches. Unlike master and slave drives from the olden days.

By all means go ahead and keep your naming schemes. It's your own stuff that after all, that for some reason you felt the need to tell everyone about. However, I might recommend trying to move past it seeing as language has an impact on how people think, and being edgy doesn't exactly have a good track record of producing the best people.

[–] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 days ago

I always assumed the name was more of a reference to audio Master Recordings.

It's the original tapes or whatever that all copies are derived from. It's also where the term "remastering" comes from, as in "we went in and rebuilt a new master from the individual tracks, and this is the new master now", versus just making another copy of the master for a re-release.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There are no slave branches like there are no slave recordings.

[–] tux0r@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] mogranja@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 17 hours ago

How about a "daddy" branch?

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

You're right, it isn't a master/slave drive. It...never was intended to mean that, though.

[–] tux0r@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

My “master” branch actually does control other branches, as releases are usually made from it, so they all depend on it.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Not gonna lie, the master branch thing has been perceived as problematic but I don't typically see an issue with it. It's similar to master bedroom or bath. ~~Kind of fucked up name origin, but~~ I don't think anyone's really making a fuss about it.

Whatever the fuck you're doing though feels like some gross, racist fantasy. It's really weird, dude. If you think that's funny you might need to go talk to some real people or touch grass.

[–] expr@programming.dev 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wtf are you talking about? It doesn't have a fucked up name origin at all. It was named "master" as in "master recording", like in music production. Proof: https://x.com/xpasky/status/1271477451756056577.

Master/slave concepts were never a thing in git. The whole renaming thing was really fucking stupid. Caused plenty of breakage of scripts and tools for absolutely no good reason whatsoever.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Alright. Doesn't change my main point. Which is the person's name for the master branch is fucking weird.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

It is weird. So what? It’s just a branch name in a software control system. That’s the point they’re trying to make.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Where did the term master recording come from?

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Master bedroom and master bath also have nothing to do with slavery.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 2 points 2 days ago

They don't?

I'm doing it wrong.

[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

Master's degrees though — racist as fuck.

[–] tux0r@feddit.org -3 points 3 days ago

Please grow up.