this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
202 points (95.9% liked)

Science Memes

17706 readers
1854 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We also can't know "for certain" that a rock isn't screaming silently, or that there isn't a china teapot orbiting the sun between Earth and Mars. Science doesn't deal in absolute certainties; it deals in probabilities based on evidence. There is zero evidence for plant consciousness and massive evidence against it.

Consciousness, as far as we observe it in the entire animal kingdom, is an emergent property of a centralized nervous system processing information. Plants lack neurons, a brain, or any substrate capable of integrating information into a unified experience.

Claiming a plant might be conscious is like claiming a calculator might be running Call of Duty. It’s not that we "don't know", it's that the hardware simply cannot run that software.

Evolutionarily, consciousness (and specifically the ability to feel pain or fear) is a mechanism to trigger escape or avoidance. Since plants are sessile (they cannot move), developing a complex, energy-expensive system to "feel" damage would be a massive evolutionary disadvantage. Why would nature select for an organism that can feel being eaten but do absolutely nothing about it?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm not defending the claim "plants think". I'm saying there is not, and cannot be, evidence to the contrary. which you seem to understand, so I don't know why you felt it took four paragraphs to agree with me.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

Those paragraphs outlined the evidence which explain why it’s as improbable as any other nonsense statement.