this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
433 points (99.5% liked)

PC Gaming

12948 readers
539 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 1 week ago (5 children)

"We need to develop a one universal standard that covers everyone's use cases."

It exists. It’s Display Port.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The use case of "make a shit ton of money licensing a proprietary standard" is kind of mutually exclusive with other use cases. It would be hard to cover.

At the time, there were too many standards. But looking back from today, we see that standardization does eventually occur, it just takes time.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

They did, it was displayport. HDMI actively removes features the TV makers don't want you to have.