this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
43 points (97.8% liked)

Linux Phones

1800 readers
83 users here now

The Discussion on Linux-based Phones.


Benefits:

  • Hardware freedom.
  • Perfect operating-system competition.
  • Full utilization of specs.
  • Phone lifespan raises to 10+ years.
  • Less e-waste.

Linux Mobile Distros:

  • Ubuntu Touch
  • Sailfish
  • FuriOS
  • Postmarket OS
  • Mobian
  • Pure OS
  • Plasma Mobile
  • LuneOS
  • openSUSE Mobile
  • Nemomobile
  • Droidian
  • Mobile NixOS
  • ExpidusOS
  • Maemo Leste
  • Manjaro Arm
  • Tizen
  • WebOS

Linux Mobile Hardware:

  • Fairphone 5
  • Volla Phone
  • PinePhone
  • FLX1
  • Librem 5

⚙️Contribute

🧼Go Clean From the Duopoly:

💻Related Communities:

📰News:

💬Messager:

⌚️Watch:


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 14 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

A user configurable "hardware" privacy switch is a contradiction in itself. If it can be controlled by software it can't do what the marketing claims 🤦

Otherwise, Mediatek soc... likely riddled by binary blob drivers and bad mainline kernel support, but lets see.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

A user configurable “hardware” privacy switch is a contradiction in itself. If it can be controlled by software it can’t do what the marketing claims 🤦

One reason to have hardware switches is because the manufacturer doesn't want malware that has compromised the OS to be able to bypass it, and from this standpoint


which is a very legitimate position


then that's very much a real objection.

But another reason is because people don't want to rely on using an app on a touchscreen, but to have a convenient way to twiddle the thing without dicking around with the touchscreen, similar to why people complain about some modern cars lacking physical controls. Lets you flip it off in your pocket or whatnot. From that standpoint, it might be a reasonable design. That is, there it isn't "I'm worried about the OS being compromised", but "I just want a convenient way to kill access to software running at an application level to various sources of data".

I do think that it's important to make sure that consumers are not misled as to what guarantees the physical switch provides, though.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

A step in the right direction is never enough, eh?

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 5 points 9 hours ago

False advertisement is never ok.

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 3 points 8 hours ago

I agree that the limitations should be stated more clearly, but even a software configurable switch is desirable. In some apps, the button to turn on the camera is a bit too easy to accidently press for my liking. If someone calls and I'm in my pj's I don't want to accidently enable video.