this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
798 points (99.4% liked)

PC Gaming

12841 readers
218 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Cool. My argument is Dan Houser exploited employees when he worked at RGS.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)
  1. That's a statement, not an argument. If you're going to start citing fallacies then I'm going to start expecting properly formed arguments.

  2. That statement seems to be based exclusively on him being a union buster, despite the union busting happening 5 years after he left.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, I did. It said:

came to this thread exactly to make fun of this “fully-rounded labour exploiter”

So you're asserting that he exploited labour. Presumably in a way that is beyond the labour exploitation inherent in capitalism. Further up the page, in a different thread, you also said:

If some of these 35 visa dependent worked for more than 9 years, I am pretty sure he was there when they were exploited to work there. There’s no indication that these workers have less than a 5 year tenure.

Ok, so it sounds to me like you're asserting that he exploited them. How, exactly? Are you claiming the act of being employed on a foreign worker visa is itself exploitation? Because genuinely, unless the answer to that question is "yes", I cannot understand what the basis of your claim is. And I think that's probably the problem @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca is having, too.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 1 hour ago

Then go back to how the fear of deportation gets exploited in the UK, that even the video explains.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)