this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
1002 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

77090 readers
1629 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (8 children)

…The same Zig that ditched LLVM, to make their own compiler from scratch?

This is good. But also, this is sort of in character for Zig.

[–] TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (7 children)

IIRC, the difference here is that Zig's plan had always been to make their own compiler, but had to use LLVM to get started and, more cynically, to try and get some LLVM contributors interested in the project so they could essentially poach them.

I am pretty sure I have seen a video interview of Andrew Kelley transparently saying that ages ago but I'll try and find it to link it here.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That’s interesting.

I dunno if that's any better. Compiler development is hard, and expensive.

I dunno what issue they have with LLVM, but it would have to be massive to justify building around it and then switching away to re-invent it.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

LLVM is

S
..
L
..
.. ..
.. .. ..
O
..
.. ..
.. .. ..
.. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
W

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)