this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
1567 points (94.2% liked)

Comic Strips

14921 readers
2097 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Some people don't like her because she makes a lot of comics that are like, "Haha, I have portrayed myself as the chad and you as the wojak, therefore I am superior!" Without having any actual comedic value. Example 1, Example 2 (both are reddit links, you have been warned).

She also threatened r/bonehurtingjuice with legal action to make them ban remixes of her comics, something not even Stonetoss (the Nazi comic everyone hates) has done.

[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Don't forget about the comic she made downplaying the seriousness of male r*pe on mens mental health awareness day, and the arguments she participated in under her own post with male victims of SA.

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)
[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like her comic. It's satire. She doesn't agree with the misandry in the comic, you're supposed to think the women's opinions are wrong. She's on the men's side.

[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

Yes, the comic is satire. The satire is "men getting treated the way female r*pe victims get treated". Implying that male sexual assault doesn't happen or that when it does, people actually believe them, when in reality men who are victims of this often just don't speak up at all because when they are, they're either not believed, called "gay" for not enjoying it, or it ends up reported with a headline like "female teacher has sex with male student".

The fact she posted this comic on men's mental health awareness day and proceeded to engage in arguments with male victims of SA in the comments - who were then banned without a chance to appeal - as well as her past of seeking out her critics to argue with even in other subreddits heavily indicates that this was inflammatory on purpose.

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

when in reality men who are victims of this often just don’t speak up at all because when they are, they’re either not believed, called “gay” for not enjoying it, or it ends up reported with a headline like “female teacher has sex with male student”.

Yes, that's how the real world treats male rape victims. This comic is about how fictional misandrists would treat a male robbery victims. Those are two different things. This fiction doesn't make implications about the situation you described.

[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Reading the responses of the women in the comic you seriously think this situation isnt a metaphor for sexual assault?

In your other thread of replies to me you're stating that it is but we're supposed to disagree with them. I'm not sure why you feel the need to defend her so strongly that you're simultaneously making 2 conflicting arguments and completely ignoring the other behavior I mentioned but I'm not really interested in continuing this discussion with you because I've presented the facts and it's clear you're personally unwilling to consider that this comic was made in bad faith

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Oh wow, that sounds positively charming.

[–] Darkhoof@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So dine people don't like her because she tells them to piss off? Not a bad reason for me.

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

She used to be pretty funny years ago, before she started focusing on hating her haters instead of making actual funny stuff. She started doing things like making a comic she knew would piss off some bigots in the comments, then making another comic (or a few) making fun of the people that hated on her to farm karma from the people who saw the original comic. Some people like that. It's just a bit too toxic for me. I blocked her account a long time ago, so idk what she's making these days.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I found both examples kinda marginally funny.

Nothing nowhere near anything that would be reason to downvote some other piece of her work, like the one in the OP.

Beyond that, call me old fashioned, but copyright is copyright.

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

Yep, if they're funny to you, then good for you. I'm not trying to claim that she's objectively bad or anything like that. I'm just explaining why a lot of people don't like her.

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago

I liked both comics. I also like bone hurting juice. Fair use is valid.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

What is this shit? Every single time I see this uninspired bullshit-ass half-cocked nonsense it's absolutely nothing. There is no joke here. There is no subtext. There is no comedy. This is just a series of vignettes showing things that wouldn't be interesting if they happened to me. I wouldn't find this engaging if I witnessed it occurring from across the room, and yet this artist has decided it deserved to be committed to MS Paint so that we could all witness their mundane life in perpetuity.

I mean, seriously, is this an NFT-type scam or something? Are they using their Patreon to launder money, and driving upvotes here in order to create the illusion that they could realistically be receiving that much? I just cannot fathom that something so "haha relatable" without the "haha" bit could be generating THOUSANDS of positive interactions.

That was pretty funny.