this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
170 points (98.9% liked)

PC Gaming

12758 readers
1367 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Of all the Golden Joystick Awards 2025 winners, Schedule 1 arguably stood out as one of the most unique – after all, it is about running your own drug empire… but, what if it wasn't?

After launching into Early Access on Steam, Schedule 1 took the web by storm and currently sits with "Overwhelmingly Positive" reviews eight months on. Players praise it as a fun management game, with many spending over 100 hours in-game. At the Golden Joystick Awards, Schedule 1 further proved itself with a win and a nomination, bagging the Breakthrough Award and going up as a Best Early Access Game contender.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hannesh93@feddit.org 2 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Another prime example of why Steam has an absolute Monopoly on the market.

A single distributor should not have that kind of influence over game development

[–] judgyweevil@feddit.it 30 points 13 hours ago

The real problem are the payment networks. If VISA and Mastercard put limits on porn and drugs in games ( as they have already done) no shop can sell it

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 25 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

This kind of game becoming successful would have been impossible before Steam. In the old days the brick-and-mortar stores would refuse to stock any game that was even remotely controversial in content or age rating. Steam has been hands-off regarding what they allow outside of things that are illegal (or, recently, that their payment processors disapprove of - if you want to talk about influential monopolies that shouldn't exist...).

San Andreas and The Elder Scrolls: Oblivion were even pulled off of store shelves temporarily due to their age ratings being adjusted. Places like Walmart are a hundred times worse gatekeepers than Valve has proven to be.

[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 20 points 13 hours ago

That's the thing. Steam didn't do ANYTHING to traditional distribution channels. They all put themselves out of business, or out to pasture.

[–] mech@feddit.org 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

https://dosgames.com/game/crime-fighter/
In this, you play your way to become a crime lord. You make money by pickpocketing, pimping, dealing drugs, stealing car stereos, breaking into banks, kidnapping children for ransom money and killing cops to get their guns.

Back then, you didn't buy games from Walmart (the gaming market wasn't big enough for that), you bought them via mail order.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

We had a game like that in graphing calculators we passed around at school.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website -5 points 10 hours ago

In the old days the brick-and-mortar stores would refuse to stock any game that was even remotely controversial in content or age rating.

Either you're too young to have experienced "the old days" or you live in a very conservative area.

There was absolutely a mature section for nearly every store I went to, they either had sleeves to cover the games with printed/handwritten titles, or were collected and kept in their own area that was in view of an employee to tell kids to stay away.

Places like Walmart

Oh, you meant department stores, not actual local game stores.

[–] Faydaikin@beehaw.org 2 points 11 hours ago

And yet, it's still the best we have. And I can only imagine the shenanigans if any of the competing storefronts held the position Steam does.

I'm fairly certain the gaming scene would be far worse if, say, Microsoft had the leading storefront.