this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
1475 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

17442 readers
3527 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Reminder that the term Stockholm Syndrome was coined to blame victims for being rightly more afraid of the police than their captors:

In [Jess Hill's] 2019 treatise on domestic violence See What You Made Me Do, Australian journalist Jess Hill described the syndrome as a "dubious pathology with no diagnostic criteria", and stated that it is "riddled with misogyny and founded on a lie"; she also noted that a 2008 literature review revealed "most diagnoses [of Stockholm syndrome] are made by the media, not by psychologists or psychiatrists." In particular, Hill's analysis revealed that Stockholm authorities, responded to the robbery in a way that put the hostages at greater risk from the police than from their captors (hostage Kristin Enmark, who during the siege was granted a telephone call with Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme, reported that Palme told her that the government would not negotiate with criminals); as well, she observed that Bejerot's diagnosis of Enmark was made without ever having spoken to her.

Otherwise, we probably agree that AmeriKKKans are a feckless, servile people.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Mod note: Do not make personal attacks towards this user, lest I have to slap more knuckles with a ruler. You can engage with the critique respectfully, or it's πŸ“ time.

[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Stockholm syndrome is a proposed condition to explain why hostages occasionally develop a psychological bond with their captors. It is named after an attempted bank robbery in 1973, in Stockholm, Sweden

?

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org -3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

My comment was in response to a comment about AmeriKKKans having "Stockholm Syndrome", which as it turns out is not a real or valuable diagnosis. However, I do not disagree with the implied critique of AmeriKKKan people as being feckless and servile people.

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

You lost me with thebrepeated "amerikkkan" thing.

A: It completely undercuts the seriousness of your comment and makes the whole thing come off as a tirade by an edgy teenager.

B: Jokes don't get funnier every time you repeat them, it was mid the first time and eye roll worthy by the 3rd.

I agree with your points, just sucks that you chose to present it in such a juvenile way.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org -5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

A: It completely undercuts the seriousness of your comment and makes the whole thing come off as a tirade by an edgy teenager.

So you disagree with the tone and not what I'm saying? Because if so, that sounds like a "you" problem, i.e. you're more interested in the tone of a message than its content.

B: Jokes don't get funnier every time you repeat them, it was mid the first time and eye roll worthy by the 3rd.

It's not a joke and it's not supposed to be funny. I genuinely hate the USA and everything it stands for.

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Man you really need to work on your communication if you ever want anyone to listen to you.

This is very much so a you problem because you're not going to get far acting like this to people who agree with you.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org -4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No I'm pretty sure you're a liberal, right? We probably do not agree almost at all. See this video for more information.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 15 hours ago

i dont think STOckholm syndrome applies to a large population. brainwashing, propagandization is what its called.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 8 points 22 hours ago

Nils Bejerot was a total hack. He tried to ban comic books, and later transcribed that same energy in a war on drugs that has resulted in some of the worst health outcomes for drug users in Europe. Unfortunately his ability to be confidently incorrect swayed a lot of gullible rubes, and his legacy still casts a shadow over Sweden to this day.

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

AmeriKKKans

whoa! so edgy, poignant, and relevant!
and so creative!
amazing!
*and everyone clapped*

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org -3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

AmeriKKKa is a settler-colonialist project, and the entity and its defenders deserve zero respect. I mentioned AmeriKKKans because the person I replied to used Stockholm Syndrome to critique AmeriKKKans on a post critiquing the AmeriKKKan healthcare system, so critiquing AmeriKKKa is relevant here. And I don't like spelling AmeriKKKa as part of USA correctly because (1) places like Central America and South America should be distinguished from the United States of AmeriKKKa, and (2) it offends the people who need to be offended, i.e. people who still feel affinity for the AmeriKKKan project and people who tone-police others who are just brutally honest in speaking their minds.

You are literally posting from an anarchist Lemmy instance, why TF is this controversial to you?