this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
84 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

12752 readers
1142 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
84
AMD preps 10 % GPU price rise amid memory-chip shortage (www.guru3d.com)
submitted 13 hours ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 32 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

It's not a shortage if production is normal but some greedy assholes keep buying them all. It's a racket.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

It’s not a shortage if production is normal but some greedy assholes keep buying them all. It’s a racket.

Your entire premise is built on “if production is normal” and yet in the 2nd paragraph of the article (which you read, right?) it says that production isn’t normal.

Manufacturers are intentionally not ramping up to increase production to follow the demand because of the bubble risk.

So, the price increase is created by a supply-side problem because production isn’t normal.

The supply-chain disruption centres on memory devices—especially those used in graphics-cards and AI-accelerated systems—where manufacturers remain wary of ramping up production after past crashes. The result: constrained supply, elevated costs, and a decision by AMD to transmit some of that burden across its GPU product lineup.

[–] NichtElias@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The way I'm reading it, the supply is only constrained relative to the increase in demand. The article isn't really clear on the matter, so it can be interpreted both ways

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

You're exactly right.

The unusual thing here is that production is not following demand.

It isn't the case that RAM manufacturers are unable to buy more RAM manufacturing equipment. They're simply choosing not to invest in new RAM manufacturing equipment because, collectively, they seem to agree that the demand is a bubble which will collapse before the investment will break even.

Since that sector typically targets a 3-5 year payback window, it means that the market is not expecting demand to continue rising long-term.

The article is simply AMD pricing the bubble uncertainty into their product. We'll likely see the Steam Machine have a similarly inflated price (and also due to tariff uncertainty)

load more comments (1 replies)