this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
815 points (98.8% liked)
Political Memes
9873 readers
1585 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Nah to any of this. His rhetoric was clear. Birthirism, build a wall, eat the dogs, sending their rapists, black jobs.
Especially for his second term, not a soul could possibly believe he would bring about positive change economically.
Its also extremely dumb for the next to nobody who voted for him for not bigotry to think choosing the worse option would somehow make things better as opposed to participating in primaries more.
Yes they can, just as so many believed Harris would win because their algorithm provided them a reality where that was a certainty.
What's dumb is to expect people to vote Democrat when the cost of living rose so sharply under Biden and his handpicked successor said publicly she wouldn't do anything to change it.
Not many believed she was going to win near election time, so Im not really sure what you're talking about. Many companies clearly started to pivot. Of course some believed one way or another but "believed" is doing heavy lifting there to imply iron clad irrational belief as oppsoed to simply thinking something is more likely than something else.
Its also a complete distraction from the point as you give no further reasoning for saying that they can, and just appear to try to shoehorn in a "both sides" message where it doesn't even make sense.
This is delusional thinking. Its like thinking the president directly controls the price of oil. Costs were rising in many places. People must be evaluated via what they do vs the baseline.
This also isnt true at all. Its basically conservative/conservative adjacent (aka reddit """communists""" whose communism purely consists of supporting the worst availible options because they don't have their idealist option) talking points pretending she didn't have any policies, when she did in fact have a lot of them.